Applied patch from ker such that int32_t's are now used instead of uint16_t's for addressing voxel positions.
This commit is contained in:
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ namespace PolyVox
|
||||
,m_meshCurrent(result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_regSizeInCells = m_regSizeInVoxels;
|
||||
m_regSizeInCells.setUpperCorner(m_regSizeInCells.getUpperCorner() - Vector3DInt16(1,1,1));
|
||||
m_regSizeInCells.setUpperCorner(m_regSizeInCells.getUpperCorner() - Vector3DInt32(1,1,1));
|
||||
|
||||
m_meshCurrent->clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -45,15 +45,16 @@ namespace PolyVox
|
||||
template <typename VoxelType>
|
||||
void CubicSurfaceExtractorWithNormals<VoxelType>::execute()
|
||||
{
|
||||
for(int16_t z = m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getZ(); z < m_regSizeInVoxels.getUpperCorner().getZ(); z++)
|
||||
for(int32_t z = m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getZ(); z < m_regSizeInVoxels.getUpperCorner().getZ(); z++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for(int16_t y = m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getY(); y < m_regSizeInVoxels.getUpperCorner().getY(); y++)
|
||||
for(int32_t y = m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getY(); y < m_regSizeInVoxels.getUpperCorner().getY(); y++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for(int16_t x = m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getX(); x < m_regSizeInVoxels.getUpperCorner().getX(); x++)
|
||||
for(int32_t x = m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getX(); x < m_regSizeInVoxels.getUpperCorner().getX(); x++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint16_t regX = x - m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getX();
|
||||
uint16_t regY = y - m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getY();
|
||||
uint16_t regZ = z - m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getZ();
|
||||
// these are always positive anyway
|
||||
uint32_t regX = x - m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getX();
|
||||
uint32_t regY = y - m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getY();
|
||||
uint32_t regZ = z - m_regSizeInVoxels.getLowerCorner().getZ();
|
||||
|
||||
int currentVoxel = m_volData->getVoxelAt(x,y,z).getDensity() >= VoxelType::getThreshold();
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user